now, i dont mean to butt heads with the Maker's Mark faithful, but honestly, at times i think Virginia Gentleman is better. or at least, i prefer it. i feel that is my opinion and i am entitled to it. but there is a little bit of a history lesson i would like to pass on concerning the distilling of bourbon. for those who care and for those that think Virginia Gentleman is "glorified water" or nothing more than a state of mind and a character trait...
first of all, everyone thinks about bourbon in the wrong way. they say that it must be distilled in Kentucky to be named bourbon, but that isnt really the distinction. just like any tall tale, it has been twisted over the years. and it wasnt until my brother made a joking, off-the-cuff remark about my bourbon of choice, Virginia Gentleman, and how it has no right to use the name bourbon because it isnt distilled in Kentucky, that i decided to get more information on the matter than i could extract from my whisk(e)y book.
everyone talks about Elijah Craig as the father of bourbon, or the first one to ever distill it. Elijah Craig this, Elijah Craig that. Listen, Elijah Craig is nothing more than and exaggerated example used by frightened distillers being oppressed during Prohibition to justify their work, which had become very successful and profitable. What better way to justify your business of making whiskey than to point to a man with a (coincidentally, i'm sure) religiously-affiliated name who happens to be a Baptist minister. They try to lessen the appearence of their own "sin" (according to the feds i guess. since when did the Constitution say that our government was allowed to enforce and coerce and destroy on the basis of their own moral standards?
dont ask this lady) by pointing to this Baptist minister (who most certainly must be a righteous and upstanding citizen) and saying he was doing it too. of course elijah Craig was making whiksey, everyone was. as soon as the western expansion got over those mountains and they began to settle, one of the first things they did was build distilleries. Did Craig exist? yes. did he produce whiskey? yes. was he the first? no. was he in Bourbon County? no. but the people needed someone to put up on front of the government as an example to show that making alcohol wasnt all that bad. they essentially wanted to tarnish Craig's name so that theirs didnt look that dirty. but the ironic result was that Craig's name is now the most famous to come out of the formative years of bourbon whiksey production. even though he wasnt the first and wasnt from Bourbon County.
Bourbon Whiskey really originally got it's name from elsewhere, not from inside Bourbon County Kentucky. not only has that county been split up and re-drawn many times, but what is now called or thought to be Bourbon county was originally in Virginia. if people try to make claims about special water sources or the land or anything that that which might contribute to the quality of the whiskey, they need to realize that all of that was originally Virginian. anyways. this argument/discussion is going in circles. Elijah Craig is pointed to because it seemed to be advantageous at the time to pick a moral, upstanding Baptist preacher to represent the production of whiskey. it wasnt because he was the first one to do it. he wasnt even from Kentucky, but then again Bourbon County wasnt originally in Kentucky either. There is a whole huge section of Kentucky that can be called Bourbon County because of the district boundaries and how they have been changed over the years. the whiskey that they produced was for personal consumption originally. then people shared it with friends and then it expanded from there. when they shipped their barrels of whiskey, they would send them floating down to the Ohio River. the barrels would be labelled "Old Bourbon" to clarify that these barrels were coming from the original county of Bourbon, not that whole area that people liked to call Bourdon. People from other counties would say that they were from Bourbon just to be associated with them. Those with the original recipes and the original production, would differentiate themselves by writing "Old Bourbon" on their barrels. This led to the recipients asking for "old Boubrbon whiskey" by name since their batches were much better than anything else produced at that time. this changed to just bourbon whiskey, referring to a type of whiskey, a level of quality, a taste, a specific recipe. It wasnt referring to a specific area of the state anymore, other people had produced bourbon whiskey that tasted as good or better. it originated from that area called Bourbon County, named after the House of Bourbon in France as a sign of appreciation and thanks for the French army's help in the Revolutionary War. That whiskey was good and it has been imitated ever since. Did Elijah Craig learn how to make bourbon while he was in Virginia? was it being produced in that area when it was still called Virginia? this is all very likely. as soon as the pioneers settled west, they would set up distilleries to make whiskey. so being a bourbon whiskey refers to a type of drink, but it all could very easily be called Virginian Bourbon Whiskey instead of Kentucky. if you want to argue about such small, insigificant things.
the bottom line is that Virginia Gentleman, the only remaining bourbon distilled outside of Kentucky, has a right to claim that it is bourbon. others from Kentucky can argue all they want, but they have no leg to stand on. it meets all the original requirements of a bourbon whiskey, the original distillers of Virginia Gentleman lived in the same county as Elijah Craig in western Virginia and im sure taught him a couple things. yet Virginia Gentleman does not try to fit in with the other bourbons, they know where their heritage lies and they identify with it gladly. They put it on the label: Virginia Bourbon Whiskey. it is accurate and correct. it is produced in Virginia, but it is still bourbon. They do have a unique, re-distillation process that starts in Kentucky and then ends in the very unique copper still in Fredericksburg, VA. the result is a unique, award-winning flavor. and from there it is up to you and your tastebuds to decide what you want and which bourbon you prefer. or i guess you could just drink Mike's Hard Berry and Smirnoff Ice instead of bourbon. I feel proud that i am a Virginia gentleman and will continue to drink to such. it is good and i support it. the 4-year and the 6-year are both very good and are working hard to train my palette to love bourbon.
try VG90 (aka The Fox) next to your Jim Beam or Maker's or Elijah Craig or Knob Creek and see how it stacks up. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
but most importantly, enjoy the beverage and the company you share it with.
here are a couple links that you can look at if you are interested in learning some more about the history or read some reviews of Virginia Gentleman.
http://store.yahoo.com/randalls/rws24391.html
http://www.epinions.com/fddk-review-1CF6-1CE7755B-3A0763C4-prod5
http://www.epinions.com/fddk-review-15E6-49A793F-3A084DA1-prod4
http://www.straightbourbon.com/articles/ccname.html
http://www.alcoholreviews.com/SPIRITS/virginiagentleman.html
http://www.beerliquors.com/buy/liquors/virginia_gentleman.htm
http://www.jimbeam.com/beam/v5/heritage/history.aspx
http://www.alcoholreviews.com/SPIRITS/makersmark.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Gentleman
http://www.visitfairfax.org/itin_reston.php
any and all comments or responses are welcome at dabele@wm.edu